Answer
Paul and Barnabas journeyed together across the island of Cyprus and the region of Asia (now Asia Minor), spreading the gospel during their initial missionary trip (Acts 13). The name Barnabas, which means “son of encouragement,” aptly describes his role in Paul’s life. Upon Saul’s conversion to Paul and his arrival in Jerusalem, the Christians there were apprehensive. However, Barnabas facilitated reconciliation between Saul and the other believers by affirming the genuineness of his faith and ministry (Acts 9:26-27).
Subsequently, reports emerged in Jerusalem about a thriving church in Syrian Antioch, prompting Barnabas to visit and uplift the congregation «Then tidings of these things came unto the ears of the church which was in Jerusalem: and they sent forth Barnabas, that he should go as far as Antioch. », (Acts 11:22). As more individuals embraced the faith and joined the church, Barnabas enlisted Paul’s help and brought him to Antioch. Described in the Bible as “a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and faith” «For he was a good man, and full of the Holy Ghost and of faith: and much people was added unto the Lord. », (Acts 11:24). While in Antioch, a prophet named Agabus predicted a famine, prompting the church to organize aid for the brethren in Judea (verses 27–29). Paul and Barnabas were chosen to deliver the relief (verse 30).
Following this, the Holy Spirit designated Paul and Barnabas as missionaries «As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them. », (Acts 13:2), and the church of Antioch sent them off. Paul and Barnabas took John Mark along as a helper and traveled through many Gentile areas with the gospel. They were “men who . . . risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ” «It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul», (Acts 15:25). Halfway through their journey, Mark left Paul and Barnabas, and this became a point of contention later. As they planned a second missionary journey, Paul and Barnabas disagreed on whether to take Mark again. Paul was determined not to bring him, due to his forsaking them previously. Barnabas, ever the encourager, was unwilling to leave John Mark behind. A “sharp disagreement” arose between them, and they parted ways. From that point on, Barnabas traveled with John Mark, and Paul chose Silas as his companion in ministry (Acts 15:36-41). Later, we see indications that the rift was healed, and Paul considered Mark “helpful” in the ministry «Only Luke is with me. Take Mark, and bring him with thee: for he is profitable to me for the ministry.», (2 Timothy 4:11).
From the relationship of Paul and Barnabas, we can draw an important lesson. Here were two godly men, loved by the churches, filled with the Spirit, enduring persecution together, seeing people saved, and enjoying an effective ministry. Yet they were fallible and did not see eye to eye on everything. They quarreled and parted ways. Even the best and most faithful among us are prone to interpersonal conflicts and mistakes. We are all fallen human beings. The ministries of both men continued— in fact, the number of missionary teams doubled! God can use even our disagreements to further His work.
Paul and Barnabas continued to rely on God. They proceeded harmoniously, despite parting ways. They had differing views on personal opinions and practical procedures. However, when it came to matters of doctrine, they both recognized the importance of spreading the gospel worldwide. They were in agreement on what truly mattered.