Categories: Gotquestions

Why did God punish David and Bathsheba’s innocent child with death?

Answer

In 2 Samuel 12, the prophet Nathan confronts David regarding his sin with Bathsheba and pronounces judgment against David. Unfortunately, this judgment included the death of David and Bathsheba’s infant son (verse 14). The death of an innocent child, instead of the guilty couple, raises concerns in light of our understanding of God’s justice and His care for children. We will attempt to clarify some of the issues involved here. Nevertheless, even as we strive to comprehend God better and accept some of His more severe actions, the emotional impact of a child’s death remains profound. It is natural for everyone to be deeply saddened and horrified by the death of a child.

God performs many “uncomfortable” actions that are necessary in a sinful world. However, it is essential to recognize that God never intended for us to be at ease with sin and its consequences (including its punishment). We should be troubled by the repercussions of sin. While mature Christians grasp this concept, it does not make living in a fallen world any less challenging.

Regarding the death of David’s infant son, some individuals may feel anger towards God for the child’s death. Two primary points of contention can lead to confusion in our understanding. The first is the belief that God was not harsh enough in His dealings with David. However, this accusation overlooks the context of the passage; God did indeed punish David, and He did so in three ways. David would never experience peace within his household again, he would face public shame for his secret sin, and ultimately, his son would die. Nathan outlined these three judgments:

“‘Now, therefore, the sword will never depart from your house, because you despised me and took the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your own.’ This is what the Lord says: ‘Out of your own household I am going to bring calamity on you. Before your very eyes, I will take your wives and give them to one who is close to you, and he will sleep with your wives.In broad daylight. You did it in secret, but I will do this thing in broad daylight before all Israel. . . . The Lord has taken away your sin. You are not going to die. But because by doing this you have shown utter contempt for the Lord, the son born to you will die’” (2 Samuel 12:10-14).

In an honor-based culture (as was the ancient Near East), some things were worse than death, like public humiliation. Dishonor would be bad enough for the common citizen, but, as God made a point of reminding David, he was no common citizen— he was the king «And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man. Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee out of the hand of Saul; », (2 Samuel 12:7). So, although God did not kill David for his evil deeds, the punishments he received caused him to live in shame. David did not get off easy.

A second point of contention is that, when God sent the illness that killed the child, He was unjustly punishing the child. However, from God’s perspective, He was not punishing the child; He was punishing David. The king’s grief was so severe that his servants thought he might die himself: “David pleaded with God for the child. He fasted and spent the nights lying in sackcloth on the ground. The elders of his household stood beside him to get him up from the ground, but he refused, and he would not eat any food with them. On the seventh day the child died. David’s attendants were afraid to tell him that the child was dead, for they thought, ‘While the child was still living, he wouldn’t listen to us when we spoke to him. How can we now tell him the child is dead? He may do something desperate’” (2 Samuel 12:16-18).

God’s intention in taking the infant in death was to punish David. AfterAfter a brief illness, the child was gathered up into the arms of God—as all innocents are. This is not a bad thing. This does not exculpate David; when David sinned, he stole the potential of a life lived from his child, and that was a horrible theft because life is wonderful, life is exciting, and God has a purpose for every life. But, using David’s other children as examples of how this child’s life might have played out, we can say that maybe God was preventing something worse. If this child had grown to reject God like his siblings, then his early death was his salvation. The death of a child will never feel right—and in no reasonable eyes would such a death seem right—yet it can indeed be right when ordained by God. In this case, that was demonstrably true, since God caused the illness.

Finally, we should not confound the high and perfect standards of God’s Law with how its subsequent justice plays out through the filter of God’s mercy. God’s Law and His mercy work together. They are decidedly cooperative, not mutually exclusive. In fact, if it were not for God’s mercy—if the Law just had its way with sin—then God would have to destroy every person who ever lived, and that would be counterproductive to His reasons for creating us (to glorify God and to enjoy him forever, as the Westminster Shorter Catechism says).

It is true that people will be held accountable for their own sins “Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.”, (Ezekiel 18:4). But this does not mean that God must strike them all down immediately. Instead, God brings them through a process called redemption—and processes take time. We see this in David’s life (Psalm 51). After he repented of his sin, David was restored to fellowship with God. You see, God wants to work with those who are willing to work with Him, as was Da

Vid, and He desires that all come to repentance «The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. », (2 Peter 3:9). The Law plays a role here in that we need the Law to clarify sin «What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. », (Romans 7:7).

God’s mercy is evident throughout Scripture. “He does not treat us as our sins deserve or repay us according to our iniquities” «He hath not dealt with us after our sins; Nor rewarded us according to our iniquities. », (Psalm 103:10). “Because of the Lord’s great love we are not consumed, for his compassions never fail” « It is of the LORD’s mercies that we are not consumed, Because his compassions fail not. », (Lamentations 3:22).

Today’s criminal law works on the principles that God established. We spend our primary energies on the criminals’ lives, not on their deaths. Only rarely do we exercise capital punishment.

Some have the idea that Old Testament justice was swift, unyielding, and deadly—that we could use more of that today! But that’s simply not how it works. We declare the highest standards of our societies by writing down our laws. But it is difficult to obey these perfectly, which should temper our view of those who sin (like David). The law serves society—and it does not serve a society to kill its citizens, except in isolated, narrowly controlled cases. Executions consume a small percent of law-and-order’s resources.

Resources today— and they are also rare in Scripture.

The concept of atonement existed even before the Law. Godly people were sacrificing animals long before Moses revealed the instructions for the tabernacle sacrifices at Sinai. But the Law showed us that atonement had a greater purpose in view: to restore the sinner to God and to the people. This is why the Law used the terminology of “clean” vs. “unclean”— not “alive” vs. “dead”— because death was not in view. Death is the last option in civilized legal proceedings.

Killing King David for his sin with Bathsheba would have sent the wrong message. We all deserve to die for sinning against a holy God. But God’s purpose for David then was the same as it is for us today: He wants to restore us to fellowship, not kill us for our sins. This is why the Law had ritual atonement (and why Christ had actual atonement), so that we (and David) do not have to die because of our sins.

It is true that all have sinned «for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; », (Romans 3:23), but if all sinners receive instant punishment in the form of physical death, then life on earth would cease. God lets people live, and sin is a part of life in this fallen world. Sin and temptation themselves become a trial, and we are better people for having wrestled with them. God had plans for David and Bathsheba— Solomon would be born to them next. He has plans for His children today, even when they sin. As we stumble along, we are also learning and growing and being sanctified.

“But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen” «But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen.», (2 Peter 3:18). “Justice and judgment are th

“Justice and judgment are the habitation of your throne: Mercy and truth shall go before your face” «Justice and judgment are the habitation of your throne: Mercy and truth shall go before your face. », (Psalm 89:14, KJV). Therefore, let us never rush to judgment. Let us instead rush to mercy.

Facebook Comments
C Carlos

Share
Published by
C Carlos

Recent Posts

What is the Moral argument for the existence of God?

Answer The moral argument commences with the observation that all individuals acknowledge a moral code…

17 minutes ago

What are the new heavens and the new earth?

AnswerIn Revelation 21:1, John witnesses something extraordinary: “Then I saw a new heaven and a…

17 minutes ago

Do angels have wings?

Answer The most common depiction of an angel is essentially a human being with wings,…

17 minutes ago

What is the teleological argument for the existence of God?

Answer The term teleology refers to explanations that appeal to design and purpose. The teleological…

3 hours ago

What is the Ontological argument for the existence of God?

Answer The ontological argument for the existence of God is one of the few arguments…

3 hours ago

What are the cosmological arguments for the existence of God?

Answer Cosmological arguments aim to demonstrate the existence of God by observing the world around…

3 hours ago