Answer
According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, fascism is defined as “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”
The prime example of fascism is Nazism in twentieth-century Germany. An autocratic dictator (Adolf Hitler) chose to prioritize Germany at any cost and also favored the “Aryan race,” resulting in the extermination of other non-Aryans (mainly Jews) and the handicapped. This led to a significant restriction of individual rights for all Germans.
Christians should denounce the events that occurred in Nazi Germany, and today, they all do. However, at that time, it appears that many Christians (or those who claimed to be) had no issue supporting the Nazi agenda. Frequently, the national cause became intertwined with the cause of Christ. This confusion arose in Germany partly because it was considered a “Christian” nation with a state church.
To provide a Christian evaluation of fascism, we must examine each element outlined in the definition above. The first aspect is that of the autocratic leader or dictator. Scripture does not explicitly condemn dictators. Historically, most leaders were dictators, holding supreme power in their realms from Pharaoh and Nebuchadnezzar to Caesar. Even the king of Israel wielded more authority than leaders in modern democracies, but the king of Israel was expected to govern justly in accordance with God’s Law as His representative. All rulers are meant to govern justly and will be judged accordingly (Psalm 82). While it may clash with contemporary sensibilities, dictators per se are not condemned in Scripture. However, autocratic dictators pose a problem.
If they refuse to be governed by the law of God and become a law unto themselves.
Christians in modern democracies have tools to oppose out-of-control rulers that ancient Christians probably never imagined—voting, freedom of expression, the right to assemble, etc.—and these tools should be used. Of course, as the definition of fascism above states, a fascist regime is repressive, so individual rights are usually suppressed. The key would be to use these rights while they are still available to prevent fascism from coming to full power.
The second component of fascism to consider is the exaltation of national good above individual rights. Scripture has no direct assessment of individual versus national rights. There is always a balance. At times, men are called to go to war to protect the nation when many of them would rather not. At times, a governmental body can confiscate private property for the public good. In the United States, this cannot be done without due process and compensation for the property. In a fascist regime, private property can be confiscated at will, but this is true of many totalitarian regimes, not just fascist ones. On the other hand, if individual rights are absolutized, the result is anarchy. There must be a balance, and Western democracies have been able to maintain that balance through a system of “checks and balances” between the government and the people and within the government so that no single individual gains too much power.
Fascist regimes also often exalt their own nation above all other nations. Certainly, there is nothing wrong with a nation looking out for its own interests, but when this happens to the detriment of other nations, it runs contrary to Scripture. Philippians 2:3–4 give us the ideal: “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or empty pride, but in humility consider others more important than yourselves. Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others.” What is said here of the individual applies equally to the nation.
An individual would also apply to nations. In a fascist regime, the individual dictator often considers himself to be the embodiment of the nation, so he may confuse his own personal good with that of the nation and its people.
Biblically speaking, it seems that the most odious aspect of fascism is the distinction between “races” and the exaltation of one’s own race above others. There is no biblical basis for these distinctions. First, biologically speaking, there is only one race—the human race with the scientific classification Homo sapiens. The differences we often associate with race such as skin color or the shape of the eye are simply variations within the species. Other distinctions such as food, music, and style of dress are the result of cultural forces. Ultimately, there is no real difference between people—all are made in the image of God, and all have sinned and all must be saved by faith in Christ or they will stand condemned before God. Racism is wrong in every instance and should be resisted by Christians both in the church and in larger society. For this reason, a Christian should have no part in fascist organizations.
Response Revelation 17:1-2 states, “Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls…
Answer The seven seals (Revelation 6:1-17;8:1-5), seven trumpets The seven seals include the emergence of…
Answer A paraphrase is a restatement of something in your own words. A paraphrase of…
Answer Moral theology is a term used by the Roman Catholic Church to describe the…
Response Fast-food establishments attract us by allowing us to customize our meals to our liking.…
Response Do you know with certainty that you possess eternal life and will enter heaven…