Categories: Gotquestions

Do eucharistic miracles really happen?

Answer

Supposed “Eucharistic miracles” are often cited by Roman Catholics as evidence for the “real presence” and/or transubstantiation in the Eucharist. Most of the alleged Eucharistic miracles involve one or both of the elements miraculously transforming into literal blood or literal human flesh. Some of the reported events include:

Siena, Italy – August 17, 1730: Consecrated Hosts remain perfectly preserved for over 250 years. Rigorous scientific experiments have failed to explain this phenomenon.

Amsterdam, Holland – 1345: The Eucharist thrown into fire overnight miraculously remains unscathed.

Blanot, France – March 31, 1331: The Eucharist falls out of a woman’s mouth onto an altar rail cloth. The priest attempts to retrieve the Host, but all that is left is a large spot of blood the same size and dimensions as the wafer.

Bolsena-Orvieto, Italy – no specific date given: A priest struggles to believe in the “Real Presence,” and blood starts seeping out of the Host during consecration. As a result of this miracle, Pope Urban IV established the feast of Corpus Christi, which is still observed today.

The Roman Catholic Church has linked many such miracles to what they refer to as the “Presence” (the actual body of Jesus Christ) in the “Host” (the piece of bread taken as communion). This doctrine, known as “transubstantiation,” is not supported by the Bible, despite attempts to use scriptural references—often misinterpreted and taken out of context—to justify it.

It is essential to evaluate any false teachings (including Eucharistic miracles) by comparing them to the teachings of the Bible. According to Colossians 3:1, Jesus is currently “seated at the right hand of the Father” in heaven. No priest, pastor, or individual has the authority to summon the King of Kings from His exalted position, especially to enter a piece of bread that will then be consumed.

Can be eaten. This is not what Jesus meant when He stated that He was “the bread of life,” as written in John 6:51: “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” He did not mean that we literally eat His flesh, as Catholic dogma teaches. Rather, Jesus is referring to spiritual life which is available only in Him. We no more eat His literal flesh than we literally eat the Word of God. When Jesus said to Satan, “It is written: ‘Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God'” «But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. », (Matthew 4:4), He was obviously referring to spiritual life depending on the spiritual food that is the Word of God, just as physical life depends on physical food.

Likewise, no one has the authority to turn wine into blood, another teaching of the Roman Catholic Church that is not found in Scripture, although, again, they attempt to apply the words of Mark 14:24 to support their belief: “‘This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many,’ he said to them.” Using common sense, what possible spiritual gain could there be from the physical eating of the person of Jesus Christ? He is Lord; He is God of all creation, why on earth would He agree to become a wafer, or a piece of unleavened bread? Besides this, when He was resurrected, He was in His glorified body. How can a glorified/eternal/undying body become a piece of bread? What Jesus was saying is that without Him, it is impossible to sustain life in an eternal sense, because without Jesus, a person is lost and they are facing not life, but spiritual death, which means that his eternity will be spent away from the presence of God, in hell.

All of the above “eucharistic miracles,” p

Many, many others, have nothing whatsoever to do with salvation or with the spreading of the gospel. When we assess each one and let the light of Scripture shine upon it, it becomes evident that none of them are beneficial to the body of Christ. They are either demonically inspired tricks to confuse and seduce people into believing something false or are simply untrue stories made up by those who place stumbling blocks in the path of those seeking the true God of the Bible.

Just because the name of Jesus Christ is invoked does not mean that the person or persons “worshiping” Him are focusing on the true Jesus, nor does it mean they even know Him. Jesus is not brought down from heaven to enter the bread, as the Catholic Church claims. Such an idea has no basis in Scripture and, in fact, is flatly contradicted. There are many other questionable doctrines, dogmas, teachings, and traditions, rites, and rituals within the Roman Catholic Church, one of which is “eucharistic miracles.”

Facebook Comments
C Carlos

Share
Published by
C Carlos

Recent Posts

What does the Bible say about Christian tithing?

Answer Many Christians grapple with the issue of tithing. In certain churches, giving is overly…

44 minutes ago

Masturbation—is it a sin according to the Bible?

Response The Bible does not mention masturbation or self-gratification, also known as "solo sex." In…

45 minutes ago

What happens after death?

ResponseWithin the Christian faith, there is a significant amount of confusion regarding what occurs after…

45 minutes ago

Eternal security – is it biblical?

ResponseWhen individuals accept Christ as their Savior, they enter into a relationship with God that…

4 hours ago

Who was Cain’s wife?

Answer The Bible does not specifically mention who Cain's wife was. The most plausible explanation…

4 hours ago

What does the Bible say about interracial marriage?

Response The Old Testament Law instructed the Israelites not to partake in interracial marriage (Deuteronomy…

4 hours ago